Yes, very fuzzy evidence supporting the idea that these people
deliberately flaunted the court order.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:31:29 -0900 Will Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>um, this is an interesting paragraph...
>"After the preliminary injunction was issued on December 29, 2006,
>several of the enjoined persons continued their efforts to ensure
>the documents remained publicly accessible. In an email exchange
>January 2, 2007 among Robert Whitaker, Vera Sharav, Will Hall,
>Oaks, and Gottstein, Whitaker offered his gratitude to those who
>helped disseminate the documents notwithstanding court orders
>prohibiting them from doing so: “[K]udos should go to others who
>helped get this information out – Will Hall, David Oaks, Vera
>MindFreedom. This is a fight very much worth fighting.” See
>Findings of Fact, supporting ex. 28. Sharav responded, “It’s
>to keep track of where/when the documents may surface again on
>cyberspace and let people know.” Id. (emphasis supplied). Will
>added, “what a great new years gift . . . massive eli-lilly psych
>5. Preliminary Injunction by Judge Cogan"
Click to compare & save $100's on life insurance, free quote
Zyprexa-discuss mailing list