Yes, very fuzzy evidence supporting the idea that these people deliberately flaunted the court order.
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:31:29 -0900 Will Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED] center.org> wrote: >um, this is an interesting paragraph... > >"After the preliminary injunction was issued on December 29, 2006, >several of the enjoined persons continued their efforts to ensure >that >the documents remained publicly accessible. In an email exchange >on >January 2, 2007 among Robert Whitaker, Vera Sharav, Will Hall, >David >Oaks, and Gottstein, Whitaker offered his gratitude to those who >had >helped disseminate the documents notwithstanding court orders >prohibiting them from doing so: “[K]udos should go to others who >have >helped get this information out – Will Hall, David Oaks, Vera >Sharav, >MindFreedom. This is a fight very much worth fighting.” See >Pet’r >Findings of Fact, supporting ex. 28. Sharav responded, “It’s >important >to keep track of where/when the documents may surface again on >cyberspace and let people know.” Id. (emphasis supplied). Will >Hall >added, “what a great new years gift . . . massive eli-lilly psych >drug >scandal.” Id. >5. Preliminary Injunction by Judge Cogan" -- Click to compare & save $100's on life insurance, free quote http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/CAaCXv1QSYSHPzDDi4DKHmEqHItCV15e/ _______________________________________________ Zyprexa-discuss mailing list Zyprexafirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.acm.jhu.edu/mailman/listinfo/zyprexa-discuss