Good morning all,

I've been working with 389-ds RPMs from EPEL on CentOS 7.6, looking to
replicate in a testing environment the capabilities of RH directory
server.  First off, thanks for your work on all this great 389 project!

I'm also doing some cross-testing with Windows clients for administrative
purposes.  I noticed that the SHA1SUMS for the Windows Console MSI files on
the download page are incorrect.

  https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/download.htm

Specifically, the following downloads do not match the listed SHA1SUM (the
text in these two lists was cut and pasted from the actual web page).

  Windows 2008/2012 32-bit
  389-Console-1.1.15-i386.msi
  772e4691daea66dcdef97cb220d9ae77ab9fbe78

  Windows 2008/2012 64-bit
  389-Console-1.1.15-x86_64.msi
  35ec5bad0d309c334ba8c5e8ac0ab183f004d7fd

I also note that there are 1.1.18 binaries in the following directory, but
they do not match the posted SHA1SUMs.  I also note the double // in the
link - which was copied directly from the link for
389-Console-1.1.15-i386.msi on the Download page.

  https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds//binaries/

My hope is that this is an administrative error - the web page needs to be
updated with the confirmed binary SHA1SUMs.  Of more concern, there is a
possibility that the binaries have been replaced with modified MSI files.

If someone could look at this, it would be much appreciated.  My guess is
the download web page needs to be updated for the 1.1.18 MSI binaries and
SHA1SUM entries.

Steve Kuervers
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to