> i am not offering to change the interface, but to implement a simpler > third interface (as usbaudio implements volume). poor diction on my part. > > the point is that there are currently two semi-incompatable interfaces, > do people consider the current two adequate? (apparently volume was not, > and i don't consider audioctl to be). and what do other people think > about an alternative?
- why do you assume that the old interface was not considered sufficient? - if you read usb(4) the first sentence on usb audio notes the interface is backwards compatable. is your interface backwards compatible with the other two? - erik
