Greg Comeau <com...@panix.com> once said: > man nm shows a symbol type of L that is possible denoting it as > a "leaf function text segment symbol". Often a leaf function > is distinguished by being at the end of a call hierarchy and > can sometimes yield difference in code generation regarding > stack space and such. Is this the case here? If so, > then a L is otherwise a T (and an l a t), or is there some > other differences?
You've got it. The Plan 9 linkers for RISC-y architectures will output these leaf symbols. Anthony
