hello,
is the following output of ping reasonable enough?
io% 6.ping -an3 hebe
sending 3 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmp!192.168.0.6!1
192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6
0: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 88 µs, avg rtt 88 µs, ttl = 255
1: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 83 µs, avg rtt 85 µs, ttl = 255
2: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 80 µs, avg rtt 83 µs, ttl = 255
io% 6.ping -an3 192.168.0.6
sending 3 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmp!192.168.0.6!1
192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6
0: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 107 µs, avg rtt 107 µs, ttl = 255
1: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 84 µs, avg rtt 95 µs, ttl = 255
2: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 95 µs, avg rtt 95 µs, ttl = 255
io% 6.ping -an3 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6
sending 3 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmpv6!2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6!1
2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6
0: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 103 µs, avg rtt 103 µs,
ttl = 255
1: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 96 µs, avg rtt 99 µs,
ttl = 255
2: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 83 µs, avg rtt 94 µs,
ttl = 255
io% 6.ping -6an3 hebe
sending 3 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmpv6!2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6!1
2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6
0: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 101 µs, avg rtt 101 µs,
ttl = 255
1: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 82 µs, avg rtt 91 µs,
ttl = 255
2: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 89 µs, avg rtt 90 µs,
ttl = 255
io% 6.ping -6an3 192.168.0.6
sending 3 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmp!192.168.0.6!1
192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6
0: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 90 µs, avg rtt 90 µs, ttl = 255
1: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 94 µs, avg rtt 92 µs, ttl = 255
2: 192.168.0.6 -> 192.168.0.5 rtt 90 µs, avg rtt 91 µs, ttl = 255
io% 6.ping -6an3 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6
sending 3 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmpv6!2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6!1
2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6
0: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 101 µs, avg rtt 101 µs,
ttl = 255
1: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 272 µs, avg rtt 186 µs,
ttl = 255
2: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 rtt 102 µs, avg rtt 158 µs,
ttl = 255
code is simplified.
io% ls -l
--rw-rw-r-- M 327 arisawa arisawa 9942 Dec 30 21:27 ping.c
--rw-rw-r-- M 327 arisawa arisawa 10943 Dec 28 15:59 ping.c.orig
io%
Kenji Arisawa
> 2015/12/28 18:04、arisawa <aris...@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp> のメール：
>
> hello 9fans,
>
> I have once posted the message below to 9front mailing list.
> however looking the origin of the problem, now I think better place is 9fans.
>
> == message posted to 9front mailing list ==
>
> I am feeling weird that ip/ping -6 does not ping to ipv6 address with
> /lib/ndb/local.
>
> # sys=io
> # ip=192.168.0.5
> # ip=2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5
> #
> hebe% ip/ping -6a io
> sending 32 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmpv6!io!1
> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 192.168.0.5
> 0: 192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6 rtt 104 µs, avg rtt 104 µs, ttl = 255
> 1: 192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6 rtt 85 µs, avg rtt 94 µs, ttl = 255
> 2: 192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6 rtt 85 µs, avg rtt 91 µs, ttl = 255
> 3: 192.168.0.5 -> 192.168.0.6 rtt 85 µs, avg rtt 89 µs, ttl = 255
>
> this weirdness comes from the order of ip attributes.
>
> # sys=io
> # ip=2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5
> # ip=192.168.0.5
> #
> hebe% ip/ping -6a io
> sending 32 64 byte messages 1000 ms apart to icmpv6!io!1
> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5
> 0: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 rtt 102 µs, avg rtt 102
> µs, ttl = 255
> 1: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 rtt 88 µs, avg rtt 95 µs,
> ttl = 255
> 2: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 rtt 84 µs, avg rtt 91 µs,
> ttl = 255
> 3: 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::5 -> 2402:6b00:22cd:bf80::6 rtt 104 µs, avg rtt 94
> µs, ttl = 255
>
> is this a feature or a bug?
>
> Kenji Arisawa
