> do you any feeling why plan9 sees only 200Mbps ether? > > is it the stack design, how plan9 accesses the hardware? or maybe the 300Mbps > quoted is only when using jumbo frames?
Jumbo frames might help if the bottleneck was in the ip stack, but I think the limiting factor is the Plan 9 usb infrastructure, which is written more for simplicity than for maximum speed.
