> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:24:36AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote: > > Eventually I might replace the mh programs with code from > > Plan 9 (still leaving the mh disk layout) but I don't expect to > > do that any time soon. > > Personally, I'd rather that wasn't the case. I'd rather see a version of > the MH utilities (or a subset of the useful ones) that know how to deal with > Maildir or IMAP (given the discrete nature of the MH commands, the latter > might be hard and/or slow).
What is the difference between mh's layout and maildir? I thought they were the same. Russ