> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:24:36AM -0500, Russ Cox wrote:
> > Eventually I might replace the mh programs with code from
> > Plan 9 (still leaving the mh disk layout) but I don't expect to
> > do that any time soon.
> 
> Personally, I'd rather that wasn't the case.  I'd rather see a version of
> the MH utilities (or a subset of the useful ones) that know how to deal with
> Maildir or IMAP (given the discrete nature of the MH commands, the latter
> might be hard and/or slow).

What is the difference between mh's layout and maildir?
I thought they were the same.

Russ

Reply via email to