On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, John Chambers wrote: > All we need now is a non-abc2ps-clone program that is > as liberal, and we can state in the standard that > such lines can go anywhere
I do not agree with this approach. A standard should document advisable behaviour, not all the possible errors that people make when writing ABC. I think the only relevant question is: would there be anything against allowing those V: lines to go anywhere? I see no objections, so I think the standard should indeed allow that. Groeten, Irwin Oppenheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~* Chazzanut Online: http://www.joods.nl/~chazzanut/ To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
