On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:19:05 +1000, Ben Alex wrote > In terms of your other email's suggestion to use a SecurityContext > ThreadLocal instead of ContextHolder, I've given this some more > thought and we can do this and still offer a clean migration path > for 99% of existing ContextHolder users. Whilst I know some people > (myself included) have found ContextHolder's general-purpose > approach useful, it seems more important overall to achieve > standardization with Spring Core in the ThreadLocal approach, and as > such it seems worthwhile refactoring to SecurityContext.
I think the nomenclature of SecurityContext does make more sense, but then again I don't need the general approach of ContextHolder. Just my 2c. Scott ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
