Tim Kettering wrote:
I’m wondering if there was a reason that most of Acegi’s standard ACL
classes use int when dealing with object id values. We usually default
to using ‘long’ instead of ‘int’ – and I believe that other places do
as well, so it seems to me that it might be simpler to use ‘long’ in
the acegi classes, since the java compiler can automatically cast int
to long anyway.
Hi Tim
Which ACL classes are you referring to? AbstractBasicAclEntry uses int
because it performs bit masking which shouldn't need the full size of a
long. If you mean AclDetailsHolder (protected class within JdbcDaoImpl)
I see your point and we should change it. Please feel free to submit a
patch or issue to JIRA and I'll get it done.
Cheers
Ben
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
