Scott McCrory wrote:


  You were absolutely right - it's an IBM JDK 1.3 issue.

Good.

 I recommend that 0.9.0
still get released with a mention in the 0.8.0-0.9.0 upgrade doc about this and that a 0.9.0-FOR-IBM-JDK-1.3 (or whatever) be available for users still on WSAD

I'd prefer to avoid multiple releases floating around. We should revert back to a standard ThreadLocal and not an InheritableThreadLocal and release 0.9.0. Does anyone really require InheritableThreadLocal behaviour?

Ben


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Home: http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net
Acegisecurity-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer

Reply via email to