Can we get the maven repos updated? Right now mvn compile fails because "org.acegisecurity:acegi-security-parent:pom:1.0.0" cannot be downloaded.
On 5/30/06, Mark St.Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ben, > > The configuration was referencing "net.sf"... some of the config was > moved over to "org." however not all. Including the userdetails > refactoring. Plus some of the JSPs were also referencing "net.sf" in > page imports. > > I am running through and testing the app right now, currently failing > on a call to getPrincipal from User object... I will fix it up, retest > it, run the unit testing and check in the changes. > > Re: the tutorial app... yeah I noticed that .. very nice... much more > concise config. > > I am usng Spring 2.0 and I am really digging the schema-based config... > > I am also using MethodSecurityInterceptors using the new Aspect pointcuts. > Not sure if we should also include examples of usage using Spring 2.0? > I assume we need to wait for it to go final. > > Uri is on it...Great, I'll keep my eyes posted for <acegi:config> :) > > Cheers > Mark > > On 5/30/06, Ben Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark St.Godard wrote: > > > Just a note, Ben I will be updating the contacts-tiger sample project, > > > I noticed it was not converted over. I will create an JIRA entry for > > > myself and update this tomorow. > > > > > I just checked and it looked to me like it was built for 1.0.0. What > > specifically wasn't converted? > > > > > Also with Spring 2.0, I noticed that a jira entry was created for > > > namespace handlers, XSD support, etc.. > > > > > http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-271 for those > > interested. > > > > > If you have someone to do this fine... otherwise I can take it up... > > > its something that I would really like to get in... and reduce some > > > of the XML verbosity. > > > > > > > > Uri Boness has volunteered, but I'm unsure whether work has commenced. I > > am happy for anyone to take a look at it who has sufficient time. > > > > As for verbose XML, I'd encourage people to take a look at the new > > tutorial sample, which is just 148 lines of XML. This includes comments, > > whitespace and full support for form authentication, remember-me, > > anonymous and web request authorization. I think that's a pretty good > > base given the features, but nevertheless it will be even less with > > SEC-271 improvements. > > > > Cheers > > Ben > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Home: http://acegisecurity.org > Acegisecurity-developer mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer > _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
