Ben, Thanks. I should've read the Javadoc on UnanimousBased decision manager more closely:
> Other voting implementations usually pass the entire list of > ConfigAttributeDefinitions to the AccessDecisionVoter. This > implementation differs in that each AccessDecisionVoter knows only > about a single ConfigAttribute at a time. So if I wanted to make use of a voter that needs more than one config attribute at the same time, would you recommend writing an alternate version of UnanimousBased decision manager, or is there a reason why Unanimous decision have to be done this way (and therefore I need to switch to AffermativeBase or something else) ? thanks again, -peter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Home: http://acegisecurity.org Acegisecurity-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acegisecurity-developer
