On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:36:58 Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote: > I think that the best place for DiscourseCategoryJob is the AssetOperations > class and
agreed. > of libbodega would be able to take the info from a method like > AssetOperations::discourseCategory() a model should be enough. > and for the QML users we will add a > AssetOperations::discourseCategoryModel(). a model makes sense. but do not use “discourse” anywhere in the API. use “forum” or another neutral word. i keep saying that bodega using discourse is an implementation detail that should not leak to users of bodega. and i mean it. just think: * what happens if we replace discourse with something else in the future? * why should the client ever even care that it is discourse running the forums? -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Active mailing list Active@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/active
