SUSServer.com is hosting a contest for a better name:

http://forums.susserver.com/index.php?showtopic=2032 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta

At the MVP summit, even the WUS product team was appologizing for the name.

I was kinda hoping they're rename MIIS to the Windows Identity Integration
Server.....


--------------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Mar-Elia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 2:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> 
> Yes, painfully, that is true. MS Marketing strikes again. I can just 
> see the advertising:
> 
> "Trust your network to a WUS"
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher 
> Hummert
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> 
> Wait....isn't the next version called WUS now or am I mistaken?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, 
> Justin A.
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 10:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> 
> Does anyone know what the upgrade process is going to be from SUS to 
> SUS 2.0?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger 
> Seielstad
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> 
> Same way all other products are announced.
> 
> My information has it that you've got a few months still before it 
> goes public.
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis Inc.
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios Toronto 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 1:10 PM
> > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> > 
> > How will we be notified when it is ready for public use
> > 
> > 
> > Lynden
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:57 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> > 
> > I believe its currently considered a closed beta, by
> invitation only.
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator 
> > Inovis Inc.
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Robbie Foust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 12:24 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] SUS 2.0 Beta
> > > 
> > > Looks like you can sign up for the open evaluation version here:
> > > 
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sus/wusbeta.mspx
> > > 
> > > But I haven't been able to locate the beta version yet.  
> > > Haven't found a
> > > Guest ID yet either.
> > > 
> > > - Robbie
> > > 
> > > Robbie Foust, IT Analyst
> > > Systems and Core Services
> > > Duke University
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > England, Christopher M wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > I guess SUS 2.0 Beta has been released: 
> > > > _http://www.nwc.com/showitem.jhtml?articleID=18400592_
> > Does anyone
> > > > have a Guest ID to get in on the Beta? Or is there just a
> > download
> > > > somewhere?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all,
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Christopher England
> > > > Systems Administrator
> > > > MCSA, Server+, Network+, A+
> > > > College Information Technology Office Indiana University
> > > >
> > > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > > List archive: 
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > > 
> > List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> > List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> > List archive: 
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> > 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
> 
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to