On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:01:46PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote: > Donno if you read the digest (I'm subscribed to the lists) - but the > flamewars have been ended. License stays as it is.
That was the final resolution, for now, but the fact is that the issue did arise, i.e. a lot of developers felt the need for a license change. You do /not/ see this on Apache, for example, and certainly not on BSD, or on X11 (not that I know of, that is). Wine is the only mature project I know whose license is controvertial. I wonder what makes it different. Probably related to them having many proprietary forks, but you don't see Apache having those. Is it because Wine is an end-user product? Or is it a cultural thing, with Windows culture influencing towards having less against proprietary forks? ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
