2008/4/26 Dr. Matthias Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How general should be AGI?
My answer, as *potentially* general as possible. In a similar fashion that a UTM is as potentially as general as possible, but with more purpose. There are plenty of problems you can define that don't need the halting problem to be impossible to solve, e.g. remember a number with more digits that the potential states of the universe. Some other comments. Have you looked at the literature on neuro plasticity? This wired article is a good introduction. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/esp_pr.html Although there are more academic papers out there, a google can find them. Will Pearson ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
