yep.. isn't it amazing how long a thread is becoming based on an experiment that has no significance?
On 8/6/08, Steve Richfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Back to reason, > > This entire thread is yet another example that once you accept a bad > assumption, you can then prove ANY absurd proposition. I see no reason to > believe that a Chinese Room is possible, and therefore I have no problem > rejecting all arguments regarding the absurd conclusions that could be > reached regarding such an apparently impossible room. The absurdity of the > arguments is just further proof of the impossibility of the room. > > Steve Richfield > > ------------------------------ > *agi* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/> | > Modify<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>Your Subscription > <http://www.listbox.com/> > -- A true friend stabs you in the front. - O. Wilde Einstein once thought he was wrong; then he discovered he was wrong. For every complex problem, there is an answer which is short, simple and wrong. - H.L. Mencken ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
