On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Terren Suydam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know we've gotten a little off-track here from play, but the really > interesting question I would pose to you non-embodied advocates is: > how in the world will you motivate your creation? I suppose that you > won't. You'll just tell it what to do (specify its goals) and it will do it, > because it has no autonomy at all. Am I guilty of anthropomorphizing > if I say autonomy is important to intelligence? >
This is fuzzy, mysterious and frustrating. Unless you *functionally* explain what you mean by autonomy and embodiment, the conversation degrades to a kind of meaningless philosophy that occupied some smart people for thousands of years without any results. -- Vladimir Nesov [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
