Dear list,
this situation posed by Mr.Merks, in which spatial dependence is not
strong enough as to be useful for geostatiscs, might be rather common.
I'd like to ask to the list, what kind of estimation of reserves should
be done in this case? In the absence of spatial dependence, classical
statistics should apply: therefore, shall we estimate the mean value of
ore content in the "deposit" by the arithmetic mean of the samples? And
attach an error to it, in the fashion of the standard error of the mean
(something like the variance of the sample divided by number of data
used)? Or did I grossly misunderstand something in the discussion, with
so much bogus-hocus-pocus and 5-line sentences?
thanks for the patience
Raimon Tolosana
En/na JW ha escrit:
Hello Readers,
More talk and not test. I want to know what the KWBP methodology does
with the Bre-X data. Is that too much to ask?
Kind regards,
Jan W Merks
+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@jrc.it
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.it with no subject and "unsubscribe
ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the
list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/
