Hi everyone,
this is my very first post on this mailing-list. I need to produce a
map of soil salinity space variability. I have chosen to compare the
estimation of OK, Regression Kriging and Indicator Kriging reliability
on my data-set. I know that kriging variance depends only on the
geometrical configuration of my samples and not on their actual
values, but I thought the kriging variance could be used as a measure
of the estimation quality. Instead reading Goovaerts (p. 184) I
understand that "the kriging standard deviation cannot be used as a
direct measure of estimation error".
Someone says that simulations would give a better result, but I found
an archive post from Pebesma saying that for many simulations the
error variance tends to the kriging variance...
So, what kriging statistics should I use to assess local estimation precision?

Giovanni

PS: I have strong positive skewness in my sample distribution. I'm
usign normal score tranformation, so I have to assess precision for
backtransformed values.
+
+ To post a message to the list, send it to ai-geostats@jrc.it
+ To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@ jrc.it with no subject and 
"unsubscribe ai-geostats" in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
+ As a general service to list users, please remember to post a summary of any 
useful responses to your questions.
+ Support to the forum can be found at http://www.ai-geostats.org/

Reply via email to