freeslkr wrote: > Hmmm ... I had thought that the = rule was supposed to stop aide from > recursively adding subnodes. So, is the rule "=/etc/cups L-n" > equivalent to "/etc/cups$ L-n"?
Oops. It should be, but it is not the same at this moment. =/etc/cups L-n Will not recurse, while /etc/cups$ L-n Will recurse for --check but not for --init. I've found the problem for this in the code, but I am not sure what I will break by fixing this issue. For now, using equal rules is the way to go. > Is anyone else seeing this behavior? Yes, I can confirm this. Sincerely, Richard van den Berg _______________________________________________ Aide mailing list Aide@cs.tut.fi https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide
