Meaning I will see if my scans go faster without those directories but I'd still like to scan those directories in a way to make it faster. It shouldn't be impossible to scan those directories should it? On Aug 29, 2013 8:08 AM, "Mason Nakadomari" <nakad...@hawaii.edu> wrote:
> Hi we are using fibre channel and sas disks off a vmware cluster. So I'm > not sure that would be a problem. Any recommendations on what in particular > to exclude from /proc /sys /dev. We don't want to exclude all of those > directories. I will try to see if that is my problem. > On Aug 29, 2013 3:55 AM, "Marc Haber" <mh+a...@zugschlus.de> wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:53:01PM -1000, Mason Nakadomari wrote: >> > We figured that the removal of a checksum would help performance >> >> No. aide is almost always disk-bound, computing the checksum happens >> in negligible time on today's system. You're waiting for your disk, >> nothing else. >> >> Run aide with a higher verbosity level and check whether it is hanging >> in /dev, /proc or /sys. I'd exclude those directories without much >> thinking. >> >> Greetings >> Marc >> >> -- >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im >> Header >> Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 >> 31958061 >> Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 >> 31958062 >> _______________________________________________ >> Aide mailing list >> Aide@cs.tut.fi >> https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide >> >
_______________________________________________ Aide mailing list Aide@cs.tut.fi https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide