I failed to mention, I am only using md5 as it stands. On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Andy Lawrence <dr.die...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you concerned with intrusion detection or only mystery bit flips? If > only bit flips change your hash on that directory to only md5, will be much > faster. > > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Paul Hessels <p...@hessels.ca> wrote: > >> I have a rather large dataset that I am running AIDE against. I am >> running AIDE on my backup server that has a bunch of systems backups on >> it. The server in question has about 5TB of data and about 200 million >> files. >> >> Currently its taking about 27 hours to run. The system is 15 drives in >> raid0 with XFS. >> >> Oddly, the bottle neck doesn't seem to be disk. iostat lists it as only >> 25% util. Simple dd tests suggest that percentage is right for both >> throughput and iops. >> >> The CPU doesn't seem to be the bottleneck. Its about 65% idle most of >> the time. The process seems to be sitting in the 'D' state most of the >> time. >> >> The number of interrupts seems reasonable... >> >> I don't know what to do next. I need this to run in 20 hours or less. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Aide mailing list >> Aide@cs.tut.fi >> https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide >> >> > > > -- > projecthuh.com > Never underestimate the carelessness of boredom... > Most people prefer Windows because most people are idiots... > > > _______________________________________________ > Aide mailing list > Aide@cs.tut.fi > https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide > >
_______________________________________________ Aide mailing list Aide@cs.tut.fi https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide