Conor MacNeill wrote:
Doesn't appear to be a path separator issue. I issue the indicated command directly from the command line, and it appears to do the right thing.OK, path separator is at least one issue. I won't have access to a windows box for another week (I'm on leave at the moment - hooray) so I'll try to sort it out then.Works for me on linux, fails on windows. Here's the -verbose output:This doesn't make any sense to me...
They were meant to be contraditory. You were supposed to connect the dots (literally). ;-)> > I sure hope that gump's build.xml doesn't ever rely on new features that > are added to ant... >... cool! And since I always bootstrap and then use the latest version of ant, this won't cause me any problems. ;-)It seems as if the above two statements (which I have juxtaposed) are contradictory. Is it OK for Gump's build.xml to use unreleased Ant features?
As long as Gump can bootstrap, I am happy. However, those newbies that you were about to lead down the garden path may find it troublesome...
- Sam Ruby
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
