>> Alright, but don't you agree that partial-apply and esp. >> reverse-partial-apply are names that are too long for such >> a basic function? > > No. Clarity is far more important than being terse: they are no slower > to read, and meaning is that much more immediately obvious. Note
if people second the other opinion, then i feel that i must speak up on behalf of the non-abbreviation group. the need for abbreviation (if any) should be satisfied by a tool (the editor), not a library. -- attila _______________________________________________ alexandria-devel mailing list alexandria-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/alexandria-devel