On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 13:53, Matthew Boeckman wrote: > > > Jean-Louis Martineau wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:25:52PM -0600, Matthew Boeckman wrote: > > > >>>If not, WHY? look into the amdump log file. > >> > >>can't find any amdump log file! > > > > > > amdump.{n} on the server. > > > > *embarassed cough* I knew that! amdump reports: > taper: wrote label `DailySet102' date `20021202' > got result for host ultra disk /webhome/bkup1: 2 -> 12408030K, -1 -> > -1K, -1 -> > -1K > getting estimates took 386.667 secs > FAILED QUEUE: empty > DONE QUEUE: > 0: ultra /webhome/bkup1 > > I seem to recall something about sizes of -1 and what that is indicative > of... but the FAQ is still down. Anyone? Anyone?
It seems like I started getting -1 when I had a disklist entry that was to large to ever do a level 0. Eventually it started doing the -1 thing. I worked around by asking amanda to never do a full. I eventually re-designed the file system so it would always fit on my tapes. Probably off-base here but, maybe it is the problem. Hope this helps, Jim > > > > >>>Which release of amanda? > >> > >>amanda 2.4.2 on Solaris7/SPARC > > > > > > I remember an old bug, it's time to upgrade! > > doh! I was hoping to not have to do that! I guess I can, however I'm > still perplexed as to how this magically starts happening after 6 months > of reliable backups. > > > > > > Jean-Louis > > -- > Matthew Boeckman (816) 777-2160 > Manager - Systems Integration Saepio Technologies >