On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:01 AM, McGraw, Robert P <rmcg...@purdue.edu> wrote: > I had been using 2048KB, which I had defined in "tapetype", when I was > running Amanda 2.x and never got this error.
Yes, it's a new error for something that used to be handled quietly. Basically, the kernel takes the 2MB write and breaks it up into two 1MB writes, only one of which succeeds. > So since is thinks that I need to give it 1M I will give it 1M block size. Good plan. > Q1> Is defining the block size in the "changer" section an ok place to add > this parameter as below? Yes. Dustin -- Open Source Storage Engineer http://www.zmanda.com
