On 6/1/10 8:18 AM, Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Michael,
>
> The comments against spam score only tell what will happen if a given email
> reaches a given spam score level.
>
> What I am asking is how had amavis reached on the conclusion that for a spam
> score of '6.9', amavis should start spam evasive action. What is the
> reasoning behind the spam score assumptions.
>
>
its just a default starting point. I doubt to much thought was given
to actual scores, except that they matched (at one time, a long time
ago), SpamAssassin's default scores.
FYI, SA's mass checks use a score of 5 points now that they score and
assume is spam.
You need to set these settings to what works in your environment.
Too low and you get spam.
Too high and you block legit email.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
> *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best Anti-Spam Product 2008, Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
AMaViS-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
Please visit http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ regularly
For administrativa requests please send email to rainer at openantivirus dot
org
