Mike:  Running the portfolio code as a SCAN seems to be an answer.  I can see 
the list of trades.

--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "Mike" <sfclimb...@...> wrote:
>
> Run your script as an exploration, outputting Buy and Sell and any other 
> interesting data.
> 
> The trades won't show up 'till the next bar of data (i.e. after today's 
> close). But, the signals are immediately available (i.e. yesterday's close).
> 
> Trade the signals, not the backtest.
> 
> Mike
> 
> --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "graphman27" <steve@> wrote:
> >
> > As I complete the creation of Amibroker signals and their subsequent 
> > portfolios, I'm having a logistical problem.  When I am creating and 
> > backtesting portfolios, I use Buy and Sell Delays of +1 for both mutual 
> > funds and ETFs.  This works best for mutual fund accuracy and, since I use 
> > EOD data only, it works well for ETFs as well.
> > 
> > Here is my question.  When I finish backtesting a portfolio and want to 
> > "switch" to "live" trades, I seem to have a problem.  If I leave the 
> > Settings for Reports at Buy+1 and Sell+1, when I run the trade reports each 
> > morning to see what the EOD data did from the previous night, I get one day 
> > delayed trades.  In other words, if a signal actually got generated last 
> > night, it will not show up on the trade report until the next day's CLOSE, 
> > which is obviously too late.  Is the only way to alleviate that problem to 
> > go back into settings and change them to Buy+0 and Sell+0?  If so, I worry 
> > that as I switch back and forth between wanting "live" trades for taking 
> > action and going back into signal backtesting mode, I will forget to switch 
> > between +0 and +1 in the settings.  Since I am now "live" with two 
> > portfolios and will probably keep working on new ones for months to come, 
> > is there a better, fail-safe way of doing this?  Otherwise, I will be 
> > manually switching many times per day/week.
> > 
> > Remember:  These are portfolios with multiple signals inside of them, so I 
> > don't want to run each signal separately and look for arrows on charts.
> > 
> > Thanks so much!
> > 
> > Steve.
> >
>


Reply via email to