On Nov 8, 2007 10:43 AM, KX5KW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think sentences 2 and 3 give evidence that sentence 1 is not true. No.....say it isn't so! A League leader exaggerating, downplaying, or otherwise twisting the facts to suit his needs? Can't be. (o: > If it was true that AM is only legal because of "AM footnotes", it > would certainly be a one step process to leave them out at some point > in the future. That's probably what some people hope will happen. Precisely why so many objected to AM being given an 'exception' in their previous attempt. > I believe the "mini uproar" showed him that it will not happen without > resistance. Good that he noticed. :) Yeah, 'mini' my.....footnote. If they get their way, they can truthfully claim that they didn't move to shut down AM. Just stifled it to a point that it's no longer enjoyable. With the expanded phone band privileges (and less competition for more spectrum by fewer hams as time goes on), the old 'inefficient/takes too much bandwidth' argument holds a lot less water. Was good to work you last weekend, Kent. Looking forward to more excellent conditions ahead. ~ Todd, KA1KAQ ______________________________________________________________ Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the message body.
