Can't say I've seen this before. Do you mean the permissions are automatically added to the AndroidManifest.xml, or that your app requests those permissions even without the <uses-permission> entries present?
If it's the former, have you tried just removing those permissions from your manifest? On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Viktor Linder <linder.vik...@gmail.com> wrote: > My app does not require the READ_PHONE_STATE and > WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permissions (there's no clause about this in > the manifest), but it seems they are implicitly added by the SDK when > minSdkVersion is set to 3. > > Will the user on a 1.6 or higher phone be queried about these > permissions when downloading my app from the market, or is it only > when downloading it through the browser? > > This is a bit of a catch 22 - I support 1.5 and I want to reach this > userbase, yet I do not want to scare potential users by requiring > these extra permissions (which my app doesn't require; it doesn't > write to the sd card nor use the phone function). > > Anyone in this group have experience dealing with this issue? > > All answers appreciated! > > Best regards, > Viktor Linder > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Android Developers" group. > To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
