Hi Marina,

we're using android:protectionLevel="dangerous" because that's what we 
think is suitable for personal data like tasks. Also, it's what the 
CalendarProvider uses for the permissions to read and write calendars.

At present the major issue is that some users get this error even though 
they install the properly signed version from Google Play.

The root of all this is that there is no way to grant a permission that 
hasn't been granted at installation time. And Google is making it worse 
instead of fixing it. At present the only solution seems to be to use no 
permissions at all and that's certainly not what this is intended for.

If there is someone from Google in this Forum: How is this intended to work?

thanks

Marten

Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015 19:21:40 UTC+1 schrieb Marina Cuello:
>
> Hi! 
> I'm not sure how to help, because've only met this problem when there 
> are several users set on a device. 
>
> If I install my app directly from Eclipse with my debug certificates, 
> then uninstall the app and try to install a production copy, made with 
> the release certificate, I've got the same error message 
> INSTALL_FAILED_DUPLICATE_PERMISSION. 
>
> Until I uninstall the app in every user by hand, I can't install the 
> new one. At least in your case the error message makes sense :) 
>
> When I was trying to understand that error message, I've read that it 
> affected permissions with android:protectionLevel  declared as 
> "signature". Are you using that? Can you change it to "normal" without 
> affecting your business model? 
>
>
> Marina 
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Marten Gajda <mar...@dmfs.org 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > Hi all, 
> > 
> > we've some problems with Android 5. There seems to be a new policy that 
> > requires two apps that define the same permissions to be signed by the 
> same 
> > key. Otherwise you can't install the app getting the error 
> > INSTALL_FAILED_DUPLICATE_PERMISSION. 
> > This is very annoying and I'd like to know that the suggested 
> > solution/workaround to this is. 
> > 
> > We have an Open Source task app that provides access to the tasks via a 
> > ContentProvider. The concept pretty much equals the CalendarProvider. We 
> > also have a (not yet Open Source) sync app that can sync to this task 
> app 
> > (or its ContentProvider). 
> > The problem is that (in contrast to the CalendarProvider) our users 
> usually 
> > install the sync app first. That means the permissions of the task app 
> are 
> > not known when the sync app is installed. So they are not granted 
> > automatically when the task app is installed afterwards. 
> > 
> > Until Android 5 the solution was to define the same permissions in the 
> sync 
> > app. But that doesn't work any more in some cases. If the user compiles 
> the 
> > task app himself he can not use our sync app at the same time, because 
> they 
> > are not signed by the same key. 
> > 
> > How can we achieve that we protect access to the task ContentProvider by 
> > permissions still allowing them to use a self compiled version? 
> > 
> > Even if both apps are signed by the same key it doesn't seem to work in 
> some 
> > cases (does Android 5 also require both apps to be from the same 
> source?) 
> > 
> > A similar issue exists when another developer tries to build a sync app 
> that 
> > can sync to our task app. He can not add the same permissions, because 
> he 
> > can't use the same signing key. But if he can't add the same permission 
> > definition his app won't get the permission if it's installed before the 
> > task app is installed. 
> > 
> > What's the solution of this mess? 
> > 
> > thanks 
> > 
> > Marten 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Marten Gajda 
> > Schandauer Straße 34 
> > 01309 Dresden 
> > Germany 
> > 
> > tel: +49 177 4427167 
> > email: mar...@dmfs.org <javascript:> 
> > twitter: twitter.com/dmfs_org 
> > 
> > VAT Reg. No.: DE269072391 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Android Developers" group. 
> > To post to this group, send email to android-d...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:> 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> > http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en 
> > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Android Developers" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to android-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to