I just hope that this time the release date for the official SDK will be BEFORE the update hits the masses. Not like it was with the 1.1SDK - it was released way after 1.1 was released to end-users (the argument from Google was something in the lines of "Hey, this is a small release with no mayor changes so don't whine that you get it so late"). Maybe I'm the only one who thinks that this is ridiculous.. One of the reasons why we don't have the official 1.5 (or cupcake or however it will be officially called) SDK is that "It's not stable enough" - fair enough but I really hope that you guys @ Google will release it as soon as the code is stable enough (eg the code is tested and ready to be released to the operators). That would give us a week (maybe more) before the operators push it to the end-users.
And don't come with the "you can build your own SDK from the opensource tree if you want" - the last releases didn't come from the opensource tree so even if I wanted, i couldn't build the SDK based on the code that's shipped to the end-users. And even if this release will actually come from the public tree, you can't expect all app developers to build their own SDK, can you? We need an official SDK - and we need it as soon as the tree is stable enough (and way before it's pushed to the carriers/end-users) Tauno On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:38 AM, AndroidApp <zl25dre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Not if you stay anonymous (hint, hint) ;-) > > On Mar 23, 7:58 pm, Anonymous Anonymous <firewallbr...@googlemail.com> > wrote: >> " Someone from Google? " makes it official i guess :D >> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:47 AM, AndroidApp <zl25dre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Can someone capable just compile the SDK and post it online for >> > everyone? Someone from Google? I dont really care if it's not >> > official, i just dont want to download the source tree just to build >> > the SDK, plus i need to do the tricks you mentioned to make it work on >> > windows. >> >> > On Mar 23, 1:11 pm, Marco Nelissen <marc...@android.com> wrote: >> > > I certainly hope there aren't "a lot" of applications that use >> > > reflection and private APIs. >> >> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:59 AM, zl25drexel <zl25dre...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> > > > Cupcake is coming, and as you know it will break a lot of apps in the >> > > > market, those that use reflection & private api. So where is the >> > > > Cupcake SDK/emulator for us to try our apps? >> >> > > > I know we can download the source codes and build it, and I know apps >> > > > wont break if they dont use undocumented api, blah blah blah, but we >> > > > should get an official SDK/emulator for cupcake, dont you think, >> > > > google? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
