HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------




The king of Greater Afghanistan 
A German dispatch from 1940 shows Zahir Shah's true colours 

Tariq Ali
Friday November 30, 2001
The Guardian 

The Pandora's box of the American empire is still open, releasing its monsters and 
fears on a world still not fully under its control. The Northern Alliance is a 
confederation of monsters. Attaching dissidents to the chains of a tank and crushing 
them, executing defenceless prisoners, raping men and women, these are all in a day's 
work for the guardians of the heroin trade. Blemishes of yesteryear? No such luck. 
We've been spared pictures of many of these atrocities, but Arab TV viewers knew what 
was going on long before the massacre of Mazar-i-Sharif. The Geneva convention is 
being violated every single day. 

The facts are these: the situation in Afghanistan is inherently unstable. Turf wars 
have already begun in "liberated" Kabul, though open clashes have been avoided: the 
west is watching and money has been promised. But the dam will burst sooner rather 
than later. Once the marines depart, with or without the head of Bin Laden, the 
alliance will discover that there is no money for anything except waging war. Schools 
and hospitals and homes are not going to be sprouting next spring or the one after in 
Afghanistan or Kosovo. And if the 87-year-old King Zahir Shah is wheeled over from 
Rome, what then? 

Nothing much, thinks the west, except to convince the Pashtuns that their interests 
are being safeguarded. But judging from past form, Zahir Shah might not be satisfied 
with the status quo. 

A document from the German Foreign Office, dated October 3 1940, makes fascinating 
reading. It is from State Secretary Weizsacker to the German legation in Kabul and is 
worth quoting in some detail: "The Afghan minister called on me on September 30 and 
conveyed greetings from his minister president, as well as their good wishes for a 
favourable outcome of the war. He inquired whether German aims in Asia coincided with 
Afghan hopes; he alluded to the oppression of Arab countries and referred to the 15m 
Afghans [Pashtuns, mainly in the North West Frontier province] who were forced to 
suffer on Indian territory. 

"My statement that Germany's goal was the liberation of the peoples of the region 
referred to, who were under the British yoke... was received with satisfaction by the 
Afghan minister. He stated that justice for Afghanistan would be created only when the 
country's frontier had been extended to the Indus; this would also apply if India 
should secede from Britain... The Afghan remarked that Afghanistan had given proof of 
her loyal attitude by vigorously resisting English pressure to break off relations 
with Germany." 

The king who had dispatched the minister to Berlin was the 26-year-old Zahir Shah. The 
minister-president was his uncle Sardar Muhammad Hashim Khan. 

What is interesting in the German dispatch is not so much the evidence of the Afghan 
king's sympathy for the Nazi regime. It is the desire for a Greater Afghanistan via 
the incorporation of what is now Pakistan's North West Frontier province and its 
capital Peshawar. Zahir Shah's return is being strongly resisted by Pakistan. They 
know that the king never accepted the Durand Line, dividing Afghanistan and Pakistan, 
not even as a temporary border. They are concerned that he might encourage Pashtun 
nationalism. 

Islamabad's decision to hurl the Taliban into battle and take Kabul in 1996 was 
partially designed to solve the Pashtun question. Religion might transcend ethnic 
nationalism. Instead the two combined. A proto-Taliban group, 
Tehrik-e-Nifaz-i-Shariah-e-Mohammed (TNSM) seized a large chunk of the Pakistan 
tourist resort of Swat during Benazir Bhutto's government and imposed "Islamic 
punishments", including amputations. She was helpless to act, but last week Musharraf 
imprisoned the TNSM leader, Soofi Mohammed Saeed. 

Not all the repercussions of this crude war of revenge are yet to the fore, but the 
surface calm in Pakistan is deceptive. With armed fundamentalists of the 
Lashkar-e-Taiba threatening to take on the government if attempts are made to disarm 
them, the question of how much support they enjoy within the military establishment 
becomes critical. The inflow of US aid and the lifting of sanctions has persuaded 
Musharraf's opponents within the army to leave him in place, but for how long? 

Add to that the appalling situation in Kashmir with a monthly casualty rate higher 
than Palestine, where Indian soldiers and Pakistani-infiltrated jihadis confront each 
other over the corpses of Kashmiri innocents. If Delhi were to use the "war against 
terrorism" as a precedent, the subcontinent could implode. 

· Tariq Ali's book, The Clash of Fundamentalisms, will be published by Verso in March 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Guardian Unlimited © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84x2u.a9WB2D
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to