I think nothing. Most mod_perl users (I think) install apreq via Apache2::Request. That can continue to be maintained on CPAN, as is, linking against httpd instead of mod_apreq
Or do you forsee a problem here? On 2/24/2015 9:56 AM, Steve Hay wrote: > What would this mean for mod_perl users? I, and I assume many > others(?), still use the perl glue part of libapreq in mod_perl > software. > > I only just spotted this thread, and just wondered how such mod_perl > users will be affected, if at all. > > On 24 February 2015 at 03:24, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> I still want to do that just lacking tuits >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Feb 23, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith <g...@gknw.net> wrote: >>>> Am I missing something? Did I miss a boatload of email where any firm >>>> decision was made? >>> >>> >>> I don't think you have missed anything. I assume very few people have >>> any clue how it's integrated/used today. The last thing I have in my >>> mail archive is joes proposal to pull the library part back out and >>> make it available in a way similar to mod_ldap.
