Great. I tried to define it briefly in the README: https://github.com/archlinux/archlinux-docker#purpose I am open to any suggestions though.
side note: The "release process" is described within a Makefile at https://github.com/pierres/archiso-manager On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Santiago Torres-Arias via arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote: > Understood. > > Although I don't exactly know what's the "original purpose" I'll try to > make sure no big radical changes are made without consensus from the > community :) > > Thanks both of you! > -Santiago. > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 03:41:56PM +0100, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> Yeah, that was the "and please don't get it the wrong way" part which >> obviously did not work. I thought I just put this out there as I >> already got PRs and mails from different people who wanted to make the >> image more minimal by removing files from packages or provide >> different images for all kind of uses cases. >> >> I just wanted to avoid frustration beforehand but not discourage your >> work. I probably failed on this one :-) >> >> Greetings, >> >> Pierre >> >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski via >> arch-dev-public <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote: >> > On 2018-03-12 05:33, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >> >> Thanks for digging this up again. You may use the github issue or >> >> project system to plan the different steps. Also (and please don't get >> >> it the wrong way) let's keep the purpose I intended for our Docker >> >> image intact. >> > >> > No one has suggested changing "the purpose". I'm not sure what is >> > unclear in Santiago's mail. >> > >> > Bartłomiej