> > I'm curious, do you have a reference on how the process has changed? I > > think it'd be easier for people to gauge interest if they know what the > > new process entails. I'm also wondering if the billing requirement could > > be handled by SPI or some other organization-level approach.... > > The old process was essentially "know someone on the inside". Billing > and access for Maps-based APIs has a loooooooong history. It existed > before Google was really in the business of selling other APIs. Thus, > it's gone through multiple iterations and a somewhat independent > evolution. Lately, that's changed and it's now using standard internal > infrastructure. As a side effect, the backdoor that Chrome developers > used to be able to provide to distros is no longer available > > The new process is well-described here: > > https://support.google.com/nonprofits/answer/3367237?hl=en >
Thank you! it appears to me that this would probably require for the distro step in to get the NGO account, which I also think would make it easier to transfer responsibilities between team members on different G-controlled products. -Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
