On Monday 29 January 2007 11:56:19 bardo wrote: > 2007/1/29, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Imho that's a pretty lame ISP you've got. Consider switching. > > Well... sure... it's not my problem, I've got a flat with them, so I > don't need to log in, but others do. I think to understand there are > technical constraints to this decision, even though their solution is > *really* lame. However, I have to admit that needing a connection to > the Internet and not having a web browser is pretty atypical, if not > improbable. Maybe nobody ever complained about it. > > > bardo > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
I agree with the browser if it's easy to implement, it will help many people who also require to view the wiki or some other source for help or resources. Although I don't quite agree with the direct coloration between an internet connection and a web browser, since HTTP is just one of the many features offered via an TCP/IP network, and even the HTTP protocol has many other uses than just browsing... -- Guillermo A. Amaral, BCSE @ site: http://www.guillermoamaral.com/ @ blog: http://blog.guillermoamaral.com/ # nick: thewonka / thewonka81
pgp3BvEHgGhRo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
