Re-sending this to arch as in our meeting this week we agreed[1] no reason to not implement DCO (http://kerneltrap.org/files/Jeremy/DCO.txt) but that we needed to enlist the maintainers to work out enforcement.
1. http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/arch/2012-April/000433.html ----- Forwarded message from Ryan Harper <ry...@us.ibm.com> ----- From: Ryan Harper <ry...@us.ibm.com> Subject: code sign-off/DCO for ovirt projects Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 14:59:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20120403195940.gb5...@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i To: bo...@ovirt.org I see that this was discussed in the past on the board list[1] and there didn't seem to be any disagreement with doing DCO sign-off for code contributions. However, not all of the ovirt projects are doing DCO/Sign-off. There are a few commits in vdms.git that have a SoB, ovirt-node seems to be using DCO completely. Nothing in ovirt-engine either. I didn't check all of the ovirt subprojects, but I think it's safe to assume that's not being applied across all of the projects consistently. Can we get that added to the commit process for these projects moving forward? Is there anything else needed beyond maintainers enforcing the need for SoB in patches? 1. http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/board/2011-October/000168.html -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx ry...@us.ibm.com ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx ry...@us.ibm.com _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch