I will send the log output later tonight. -----Original Message----- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:42 PM To: archiva-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: archiva-1.0.2 eta?
What is the error you are getting? I tried the one you previously posted to the list and it ran through the unit tests on the branch just fine. - Brett On 14/03/2008, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using the SNAPSHOT that Brett provided, and MRM-691 seems to be > fixed, but not MRM-632 as I am still seeing that for some artifacts. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: greyfairer1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 9:20 AM > To: archiva-users@maven.apache.org > > Subject: Re: archiva-1.0.2 eta? > > > So, apart from the log file issues, are MR-632 and MRM-691 fixed in the > 1.02-SNAPSHOT release? Or should I build archiva from trunk to check? > > > Brett Porter wrote: > > > > Are these issues new, or were they present before (just wondering if > > it's a regression because of my changes). Anyway, I can add more > > tests. > > > > How is the performance/stability after a little while now? > > > > - Brett > > > > On 27/02/2008, Jason Chaffee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Looks like I still have some issues. I have attached parts of the > log > >> file because the entire file is too large. Let me know if you would > >> like any other information. I am using the same archiva.xml as > before. > >> These errors may be due to some non-standard artifacts in our repo, > but > >> most of them do seem correct to me. I do know that we have some > >> artifacts that do not have poms though. > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/archiva-1.0.2-eta--tp15643198p16030511.html > Sent from the archiva-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Brett Porter Blog: http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
