Or, to quote Hayek, as "socialists of all parties." David Levenstam
In a message dated 9/3/03 3:57:29 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >And with the budget under the Bush Administration outsocializing the > >socialist Clinton by triple and growing (in social spending alone) it isn't > >clear that there is any value in knowing whether media people are republican > >socialists or democratic socialists. Thanks(?) to our current President > >Hillary the democratic socilalists look as conservative as their so-called > >alternative. Perhaps they should be referred to only as republican > >socialists or democratic socialists, or simply all as socialists. > > >
