To think of permitting death as a "forgone opportunity cost" does not seem to 
be a subject that should be discussed.  Personally, I agree with the critics 
who cite that this drug will lead to increased abortions due to its ease of 
access and other factors.  This will certainly be a welcome substitute for 
surgical abortions, yet I agree with Lynn Gray who stated that the "forgone 
opportunity costs" of the loss in children will always be greater than any 
opportunity cost associated with a drug used for indiscriminatory killing.  

Reply via email to