SH:
> I suppose there *could* be a neutral tax, but what would be the point?
> It would be something like taking five dollars from everyone and giving
> them back five dollars worth of 'services'.

FF:
<<The whole point is to provide collective services.
If you join a club and pay dues to get some services, do you then
complain
that you paid money and got services?>>

Of course not. How does that apply to governments and taxation, though?

Susan Hogarth 
Triangle Beagle Rescue of NC
www.tribeagles.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to