Faré <fah...@gmail.com> writes: > The cCLan list has apparently become the asdf-devel list. > > Is this still where the upstream for split-sequence is? If so, can > this patch be applied? If not, who's in charge?
I guess I am, unless someone else wants to be. > diff -rN -u old-split-sequence/build.xcvb new-split-sequence/build.xcvb > --- old-split-sequence/build.xcvb 1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500 > +++ new-split-sequence/build.xcvb 2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 -0400 > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +#+xcvb > +(module (:fullname "split-sequence" > + :depends-on ("split-sequence") > + :supersedes-asdf ("split-sequence"))) I don't have a problem with this bit. (I don't see why you need a reader conditional, but OK, whatever) > --- old-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp 2009-10-22 20:10:35.110170150 > -0400 > +++ new-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp 2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 > -0400 > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ > ;;; * (split-sequence #\; ";oo;bar;ba;" :start 1 :end 9) > ;;; -> ("oo" "bar" "b"), 9 > > +#+xcvb (module ()) > + > (defpackage "SPLIT-SEQUENCE" > (:use "CL") > (:nicknames "PARTITION") This is... no. Please find some way of not infesting code with build-related metainformation. Best, Christophe _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel