Re: [asdf-devel] XCVB patch for split-sequence

[Christophe Rhodes]

Faré <fah...@gmail.com> writes:

> The cCLan list has apparently become the asdf-devel list.
>
> Is this still where the upstream for split-sequence is? If so, can
> this patch be applied? If not, who's in charge?

I guess I am, unless someone else wants to be.

> diff -rN -u old-split-sequence/build.xcvb new-split-sequence/build.xcvb
> --- old-split-sequence/build.xcvb     1969-12-31 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
> +++ new-split-sequence/build.xcvb     2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 -0400
> @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> +#+xcvb
> +(module (:fullname "split-sequence"
> +         :depends-on ("split-sequence")
> +         :supersedes-asdf ("split-sequence")))

I don't have a problem with this bit.  (I don't see why you need a
reader conditional, but OK, whatever)

> --- old-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp    2009-10-22 20:10:35.110170150 
> -0400
> +++ new-split-sequence/split-sequence.lisp    2009-10-22 20:10:35.114171499 
> -0400
> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
>  ;;; * (split-sequence #\; ";oo;bar;ba;" :start 1 :end 9)
>  ;;; -> ("oo" "bar" "b"), 9
>  
> +#+xcvb (module ())
> +
>  (defpackage "SPLIT-SEQUENCE"
>    (:use "CL")
>    (:nicknames "PARTITION")

This is... no.  Please find some way of not infesting code with
build-related metainformation.

Best,

Christophe

_______________________________________________
asdf-devel mailing list
asdf-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel