The headers don¹t say that the score was less than the lower limit and show
no scoring other than than the bayesian, which meets the lower limit. The
sender wasn¹t whitelisted.
Any ideas why it wasn¹t tagged and was marked as ok mail? I¹m running
1.7.1.2 1000000000
Mar-18-10 07:58:06 13485-23265 208.46.178.158 <jaksk...@reference.com> to:
sh...@fredco-md.net [scoring] Bayesian Check - Prob: 1.00000 => spam;
Mar-18-10 07:58:07 13485-23265 [MessageOK] 208.46.178.158
<jaksk...@reference.com> to: sh...@fredco-md.net -- Message OK -- [You have
1 new message] -> okmail/You_have_1_new_message__61.eml;
X-Assp-Delay: sh...@fredco-md.net was delayed for 12m 1s; 18 Mar 2010
07:58:05 -0400
X-Assp-Received-SPF: none ip=208.46.178.158 mailfrom=jaksk...@reference.com
helo=arlington-greene.com
X-Assp-Score: 45 (Bayesian Probability: 1.0000)
Received: from arlington-greene.com ([208.46.178.158]
helo=arlington-greene.com)
with IPv4:25 by mailgw2.frederickcountymd.gov; 18 Mar 2010 07:58:04
-0400
Received: from reference.com ([72.17.202.50]) by arlington-greene.com with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:46:03 -0400
From: HSBC Bank <jaksk...@reference.com>
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Interagency Information Technologies
Frederick County Government
Frederick, MD 21701
pdick...@frederickcountymd.gov
301-600-2399/x12399
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
