Does ASSP check for packets received during the delay period (before the 220 command is sent)? If so, does it do anything to block the offender when it tries again?
Marrco wrote: >> I'm anxious to try this in ASSP. I've used Response Delays with >> other software and found it very effective. But I've used much >> longer delays (up to 40 seconds) and I've also used delays after >> every command. One feature that I've found works very well and helps >> to reduce the amount of time you are holding a connection open, is >> to check for additional commands coming from the sender BEFORE you >> send your response. If that behaviour is detected, you can be very >> sure that it is a SPAMMER. Then you can immediately take whatever >> steps you think are necessary. >> >> Ken Eisman >> Information Services Director >> Matagorda County > > 100% correct. I know how effective this technique is, and I agree > with you, but fwik there are a few tech problems in doing this with > perl. We already discussed this feature a few months ago. > > I hope fritz finds some way to implement this. He usually is very > fast and responsive to improvements great new features in assp. I > suggested a few hours ago to bypass nodelay.txt, ipwl.txt and > ipnp.txt (and maybe more), and .51 has a bypass for nodelay. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
