> Please show me the header/log of that mail. Is the mail "local"? It's coming from a different machine, but a.com is in b.com's localDomains. b.com is a.com's MX, but b.com generates and send out mail on it's own.
Here are the logs and headers. Notice how the client (and I assume the MTA) receive a changed Message-Id. == a.com Sendmail == Jan 11 09:59:12 a.com sendmail[28277]: [ID 801593 mail.info] q0BExC5r028275: to=<[email protected]>, ctladdr=<[email protected]> (80/80), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp, pri=120440, relay=b.com. [2.2.2.2], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (q0BExCk4006671 Message accepted for delivery) == b.com ASSP == Jan-11-12 09:59:12 Connected: 1.1.1.1:46819 -> 2.2.2.2:25 (listenPort) -> 127.0.0.1:38939 > 127.0.0.1:1025 , 8-9; Jan-11-12 09:59:12 m-32629-59992 [Local] 1.1.1.1 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] local -- 1.1.1.1 in acceptAllMail -- [TEST ASSP DKIM] -> /var/db/assp/notspam/32629-59992.eml; Jan-11-12 09:59:12 m-32629-59992 1.1.1.1 <[email protected]> to: [email protected] finished message - received DATA size: 1.16 kByte - sent DATA size: 1.18 kByte; Jan-11-12 09:59:12 Disconnected: 1.1.1.1 ; == b.com Sendmail == Jan 11 09:59:12 b.com sendmail[6671]: [ID 801593 mail.info] q0BExCk4006671: from=<[email protected]>, size=1177, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<[email protected]>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=localhost [127.0.0.1] Jan 11 09:59:12 b.com opendkim[2943]: [ID 632817 mail.info] q0BExCk4006671: s=mail d=a.com SSL error:04077068:rsa routines:RSA_verify:bad signature Jan 11 09:59:12 b.com sendmail[6671]: [ID 801593 mail.info] q0BExCk4006671: Milter insert (1): header: Authentication-Results: b.com; dkim=fail (verification failed)\n\[email protected] header.b=XXYHiqBB;\n\tdkim-adsp=unknown Jan 11 09:59:12 b.com opendkim[2943]: [ID 614597 mail.notice] q0BExCk4006671: bad signature data Jan 11 09:59:12 b.com sendmail[6672]: [ID 801593 mail.info] q0BExCk4006671: to=<[email protected]>, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=local, pri=31525, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent == Message header on b.com== > cat /var/db/assp/notspam/32629-59992.eml X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.8(1.1.01) on b.com X-Assp-Passing: 1.1.1.1 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: b.com m-32629-59992 Received: from a.com ([1.1.1.1] helo=a.com) by b.com with ESMTP (ASSP 1.9); 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 Received: from a.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.com (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0BExC5r028275 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a.com; s=mail; t=1326293952; bh=TN5zhHpQDDJUEfM5DIhYE0frhYE=; h=Date:From:Message-Id:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XXYHiqBB2dN+NJ2VK1QtqdiBtAYwChmnz4nQMsQ2JSLb8xJetAJMHCXNInNbz38MS ru5linEgHbSTP91xPqv5mLTfsjRignb/D6INq8CQvG8nwF9f5mbMjcIPgtbJI2H Received: (from a@localhost) by a.com (8.14.3/8.14.4/Submit) id q0BExC73028274 for [email protected]; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) From: a <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]> Subject: TEST ASSP DKIM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain == Message header received by client == Received: from a.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by b.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0BExCk4006671 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: b.com; dkim=fail (verification failed) [email protected] header.b=XXYHiqBB; dkim-adsp=unknown Received: from a.com ([1.1.1.1] helo=a.com) by b.com with ESMTP (ASSP 1.9); 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 Received: from a.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.com (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0BExC5r028275 for <[email protected]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=a.com; s=mail; t=1326293952; bh=TN5zhHpQDDJUEfM5DIhYE0frhYE=; h=Date:From:Message-Id:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XXYHiqBB2dN+NJ2VK1QtqdiBtAYwChmnz4nQMsQ2JSLb8xJetAJMHCXNInNbz38MS ru5linEgHbSTP91xPqv5mLTfsjRignb/D6INq8CQvG8nwF9f5mbMjcIPgtbJI2H Received: (from a@localhost) by a.com (8.14.3/8.14.4/Submit) id q0BExC73028274 for [email protected]; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:59:12 -0500 (EST) From: a <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]> Subject: TEST ASSP DKIM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 5 Status: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
