On 28 September 2012 07:44, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote:
>
> { INIT ast-ksh } 2012-09-27 alphas posted to
> www.research.att.com/sw/download/alpha/
>
> the next alpha will migrate current -lcmdtst ksh builtins to -lcmd,
> will static bind all -lcmd builtins to the /opt/ast/bin virtual dir,
> and will provide a way to rename /opt/ast/bin via the environment
We experience more failures on Linux, both latest Suse and Fedora
(posix_spawn() has been disabled):
test arrays begins at 2012-09-28+09:38:47
arrays.sh[665]: Fooa[a] is {Foo[a]} not AA
test arrays failed at 2012-09-28+09:50:19 with exit code 1 [ 147 tests 1 error ]
test options begins at 2012-09-28+10:18:25
./src/cmd/ksh93/tests/options.sh: line 121: 25075: Memory fault
./src/cmd/ksh93/tests/options.sh: line 125: 25079: Memory fault
options.sh[420]: option i not in $-
options.sh[420]: option E not in $-
options.sh[429]: option interactive not equivalent to i
options.sh[429]: option rc not equivalent to E
options.sh[446]: setting HISTFILE when not in environment fails
test options failed at 2012-09-28+10:18:31 with exit code 1 [ 143
tests 1 error ]
test pty begins at 2012-09-28+10:18:45
pty.sh[152]: POSIX sh 091(C): line 164: expected "^hello\r?\n$", got EOF
pty.sh[168]: POSIX sh 093(C): line 176: expected "^hello\r?\n$", got EOF
pty.sh[184]: POSIX sh 094(C): line 194: expected "^hello\r?\n$", got EOF
pty.sh[227]: POSIX sh 097(C): line 235: expected "^ok\r?\n$", got EOF
pty.sh[431]: process/terminal group exercise: line 435:
expected ":$|:\E|lines", got EOF
test pty failed at 2012-09-28+10:18:46 with exit code 1 [ 20 tests 1 error ]
The pty failures are specific to Suse, but only because Suse ships
/usr/bin/pty which is required by the test.
Ced
--
Cedric Blancher <cedric.blanc...@googlemail.com>
Institute Pasteur
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@research.att.com
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
