On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 02:59:56PM -0500, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > ----- Jay R. Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian *did* say "for building from SVN", Kevin. > > Which is not specific enough, as Matt already pointed out.
No, but the response he got was "the instructions are for building the current release version; they'll be updated when the new version becomes a production release"... which is unuseful to someone who's not *building* a release version, which was my point. > > It sounds to me like the current SVN *has* had it's build process > > change, which seems orthogonal to "released versions"... or am I > > missing something. > > There is no 'the' current SVN, there are three main branches that we >currently maintain, and they do not all use the same build process. >That page also makes no reference to the fact that the 1.4 branch >exists, so it's at best incomplete. Yes! That was precisely his point, and mine. :-) Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 "That's women for you; you divorce them, and 10 years later, they stop having sex with you." -- Jennifer Crusie; _Fast_Women_ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
